|
Post by saaaaaa on Jun 3, 2007 1:05:25 GMT 10
Errr .... um ... they dont look at whos held the belt.... if you look at a top belt ... people tend to know whos won the belt....not whos gone for it. Remember that international talent that come to Australia are more then likely to go for the feds world title to add more hype. The title is big to AWF but it is not that significant in the world. I understand where you are coming from Shane ...but unless the person physically wins the belt, to me it does not add anything to the belt except a successful title defence. So you're saying it would mean the same thing if TNT succesfully defended against some rookie thats had 3 months in the business then if he succesfully defended it against Bryan Danielson?
|
|
|
Post by wwekane316 on Jun 3, 2007 1:08:22 GMT 10
yes.... the title grabbed nothing from a defence.... the person holding the belt just got a win....
and you know the person who has had 3 months in the business...if he was from australia ...would have a better chance of winning it then danielson
|
|
IanG
New Member
Normal Service Will Resume As Soon As Possible
Posts: 16
|
Post by IanG on Jun 4, 2007 22:50:21 GMT 10
I actually saw the first ever defence of the title back in 2001. It was the night after TNT won it in a tournement at Penrith Panthers. He defended it against Gladiator Vulcan. So I would say yeah it would be
|
|